Discussion:
Dan went to work (10/12/1977)
(too old to reply)
Stefan Ram
2024-12-09 11:16:42 UTC
Permalink
On December 10, 1977, Daniel L. Everett went to work with the
Pirahã people.
HenHanna
2024-12-09 18:25:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Stefan Ram
On December 10, 1977, Daniel L. Everett went to work with the
Pirahã people.
Did anyone watch the 90 min (?) documentary about Chomsky that
came out about 10 years ago? ------- (it was lame)



(i liked the film [Manufacturing Consent]) Around that time, i went
to a talk by him.



The book by Tom Wolfe was good... Half of the book was on Chomsky.
------- his early years, His rise to fame.


the other half of the book is on Daniel L. Everett

_______________________


Daniel L. Everett is known for his work on the Pirahã people
of the Amazon, where he challenges aspects of linguistic theory,
particularly Noam Chomsky's idea of universal grammar.

He argues that language is profoundly shaped by culture and
environment, suggesting that the Pirahã language lacks certain features
common in other languages, such as fixed words for numbers and tenses.

Everett's assertions emphasize the diversity of human
experience and cognition, suggesting that there is no single model of
language that applies universally.

__________________________

Tom Wolfe's book, *The Kingdom of Speech*, explores the debate
surrounding language and its origins, particularly engaging with the
ideas of Noam Chomsky and Daniel L. Everett.

Many readers find it thought-provoking and accessible, as Wolfe
combines narrative nonfiction with his signature style.

__________________________


Yes, some linguists have criticized The Kingdom of Speech for
its portrayal of linguistic theory and its simplification of complex
debates.

Critics argue that Wolfe sometimes misrepresents Chomsky's work
and the broader field of linguistics.

While the book is praised for its engaging narrative and storytelling,
many professionals in linguistics feel it lacks depth and accuracy in
discussing the intricacies of language development and theory.

As a result, the reception among linguists has been mixed, with some
appreciating its cultural commentary while others take issue with its
scholarly rigor.

Loading...