allingus
2005-01-27 16:49:33 UTC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Polat Kaya" <***@COMPMORE.NET>
To: <***@yahoogroups.com>;
<***@yahoogroups.com>; <***@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 7:45 PM
Subject: [bcn2004] Part-2 Turkish-Sumerian Kinship: Was it
"Dingir.AMAR-Dingir.ZUEN", "Tengir.TURAN ZU-HAN (SU-HAN)" or
"Tengir.TURAN UZ-HAN (OGUZ-HAN)"?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Part-2 Turkish-Sumerian Kinship: Was it "Dingir.AMAR-Dingir.ZUEN",
"Tengir.TURAN ZU-HAN (SU-HAN)" or "Tengir.TURAN UZ-HAN (OGUZ-HAN)"?
By POLAT KAYA
---------------------------------------------------------------------
About the name AMAR-SIN (AMAR-ZUEN):
In Part-1 of this series of writings, we talked about how the Sumerian
sign meaning TUR had somehow been read as MAR - as pointed out by C. J.
Gadd, and we talked about the supposedly "Akkadian" name "MARDUK".
Reinserting the original Sumerian TUR back into MARDUK then made it
clearly Turkic TURDUK. It has become even further clear that the "DUK"
in the name "MARDUK" is actually a reversal of the Turkish word "KUD"
(KUT) meaning "sacred, divine, holy". Thus the fabricated name
"MARDUK", referring to the Supreme God or the Sun God of Babylon, when
viewed as TURKUD, would mean "TUR is Sacred" or "Sacred TUR", i.e.,
"Sacred Bull". This is the same as the Turkish "TUR-KUD" or "TUR-KUT"
TURGUD). The Turkish name TURGUD is a widely used masculine name in
the Turkish world, evidently originating from this ancient Turanian
Sky-God's name (TUR-KUT). Thus, the name "MARDUK", before it was
usurped from Sumero-Turkish culture and traditions, was probably
"TUR-KUD" (TUR-KUT, TUR-GUD) or "KUT-TUR" (GUD-TUR) meaning "Sacred
Sky-God TUR". We must also note here that "GUD" in Sumerian was "Bull".
[20] Therefore, while in one sense, TUR-GUD (TUR-KUT) was
"SACRED-TUR" referring to the Holy Sky God but in another sense,
TUR-GUD, where GUD is Sumerian BULL, was "SKY-GOD TUR the BULL". In
Turkish, UD or UT is also Cattle so Sumerian GUD and Turkish UD are
linguistically akin.
Now it is important that we examine another Sumerian name called
"dingir.AMAR dingir.ZUEN" which has been changed into Akkadian as
AMAR-SIN - another important misrepresentation. But before I go into
discussing it I would like to say that I will be referring to some
Sumerian texts given in the book entitled "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar
and Texts" by John L. Hayes (JLH). In this discussion I will be dealing
with the first few lines of the text (See Attachment Sumer_Text 13a).
Additionally, I would like to make it clear that in my discussions I
may be critical of certain readings of Sumerian texts in general,
however, these should not be taken as my criticisim of John L. Hayes or
his book. In fact I commend him for writing such an excellent book on
the Sumerian language. He has provided us with excellent and most
candid explanations. As a reader of his book, I am grateful that he has
written what he has written in the way he saw it. He asks very valid
questions and explains them to the benefit of the reader. His straight
and candid explanations are appreciated.
About the name ZUEN, John L. Hayes gives the following information:
[21]
"ZUEN This seems to be another name of NANNA, although it is not clear
why he had two names. Jacobsen thinks that the term NANNA refers
specifically to the god's role as the "full moon", and ZUEN refers to
his role as the "crescent moon". It has also been suggested that ZUEN
is the Akkadian equivalent of Sumerian NANNA; that is, they are two
different names for the same deity. However, there is no obvious
Semitic etymology for ZUEN.
The Akkadian equivalent of this DN is usually transcribed as either
"SIN" or "SUEN". The Sumerian word was also borrowed into Akkadian as a
common noun, appearing as SINU, SUENU, SINNU, and ShINNU. It is
glossed by the CAD as: "1) the moon 2) crescent shaped or semi-circular
object". [22]
"AMAR-(d)ZUEN Etymologically, "young bull of Zuen", amar.Zuen.(ak).
The name of this ruler is often transcribed "Amar-Sin" or "Amar-Zuen",
which are really Akkadianized transcriptions.
Early scholars believed that this PN was Akkadian. The Akkadian
equivalent of AMAR is BURU. Therefore, the name appears in some older
secondary literature as "BUR-SIN", or something similar. Almost all
modern scholars believe that the name is Sumerian, although there is
really not much evidence to prove this."
All of these names mentioned in the above given excerpt from Hayes are
extremely important from the Turkish point of view, because not only
were they were Sumerian but they were also Turkish in origin and are
related to the Turkish UZ-HAN (OGUZ-HAN), SU-HAN, and AY-HAN names.
Evidently they were borrowed-without-permission, anagrammatized and
disguised by the Akkadians.
The Akkadian usurpation of Sumero-Turkish deity names led eventually to
the creation of Judeo-Christianity religions and the death of the
ancient Turanian Sky-God Oguz/Tur religion from which they took all of
their tenets.
Regarding the name AMAR-SIN, John L. Hayes writes the following
regarding the Sumerian Text 13a: [23]
"Line 1. As was the case with Shulgi, the name AMAR-SIN is preceded by
the determinative for divine names. There are thus two divine
determinatives in the line: the second is for DN ZUEN, and the first
is for the PN Amar-d.Zuen.
Lines 2-4. These lines form a relative clause modifying Amar-Sin of
Line 1. mu means "name", and pad is something like "to reveal".
mu....pad is a compound verb, meaning approximately "to propose". The
underlying idea is that the name Amar-Sin was proposed by Enlil in the
council of the gods, meeting Nippur, to be the king of Sumer and
Akkad."
{Note: DN stands for Divinity Name, and PN stands for Personal Name
(proper name)}.
This indicates that Sumerian "dingir.AMAR-dingir.ZUEN" was not
"AMAR-SIN" to begin with. It was taken from Sumerian and/or Turkish,
reformatted and renamed to make it "Akkadian".
The question that comes to mind here is that in reading Sumerian text,
what justification did they have for coming up with the name AMAR-SIN
from a name that they first read as "dingir.AMAR-dingir.ZUEN" while it
was actually written in Sumerian as "dingir.TUR-dingir.EN-ZU (or
EN-UZ)" or "dingir.TUR-AN-EN-ZU (or EN- UZ)"? The Sumerian word "EN"
meaning "lord" is the Turkish word "HAN" meaning "lord". Additionally,
the Sumerian sign that has been read as "ZU" most likely was also "UZ"
which has been avoided up to now. It has very important implications
which I will discuss below.
Incidentally, here it is important to note that the supposedly
"Akkadian" word for Sumerian "EN" was "BELUTU". [24] When we examine
this "Akkadian" "BELUTU", we find that it is very similar to the
Turkish expression "BEILUTU" (BEYLI IDI) meaning "he who is with
lordship". In fact, this similarity is too close to be a coincidence.
Obviously Akkadians were anagrammatizing Turkish words then. This is an
indication that Turkish was present in Sumerian times and was a fully
developed language with root words and suffixes. In this Akkadian
anagram of Turkish, Turkish BEI (BEY) meaning "lord" has been reduced
to "BE", and the remaining LU and TU has been kept as they are in
Turkish.
Turkish LU is a suffix meaning "with" and TU (UTU/UDU/IDI) which is the
name of SUN-God) means "it is". Turkish siffix "TU" is another form of
Turkish suffix "TUR" meaning "it is" which was the name of "Sky-God".
These most frequently used Turkish suffixes alone make
Turkish "The SUN LANGUAGE" (UTU (OD O) LANGUAGE) and "TUR LANGUAGE".
a) First of all the Sumerian sign which is read as "ZU" by
Sumerologists is the sign for "water" which is "SU" in Turkish. It is
not believable that those who deciphered an unknown and so-called "dead
language", using the misleading language of Akkadian, did not know that
Sumerian "ZU" and Turkish "SU" were one and the same. That they knew
but would not admit that "ZU" was Turkish "SU". Hence they avoided
using the name Turkish. The Sumerian sign for "ZU" is also present in
the Sumerian names NINGIRSU [25], and ABZU ("apsu") [26] although
with some differences in the signs and meanings. The meaning for
"ABZU" ("apsu") is indicated as "water basin" [27].
Additionally, the Sumerian term ZU and its sign are very much related
to Turkish word "UZ" which is the Turkish name for Sky-God "OGUZ" and
the Oguz (Tur/Turk) peoples. Yet the Sumerologists have dwelled only on
the ZU (SU) , i.e., "water" aspect of the sign. For example, in one
meaning, the Sumerian word "ABZU" or "APSU" means "Father-Water"
obviously from Turkish "APA-SU".
With this background, then the Sumerian signs that have been read as
"ZU-EN" would have been the Turkish "SU-HAN (or HAN-SU) meaning "Lord
Waters" which equates it with "ABZU" (APSU or APA-SU).
John L. Hayes writes the following: [28]
"ABZU This is composed of two signs, the ZU-sign followed by the
AB-sign . However, it is known that the AB-sign was read before the
ZU-sign. That is, the word was pronounced something like /abzu/. The
phenomenon is similar to that of the DN ZUEN, which was pronounced
/zuen/, although written EN-ZU. In older transliterations it may appear
as "ZU-AB."
This explanation shows that these two names, i.e., ABZU and ZUEN, have
gone through some intentional confusion. In the process, the Turkish
name "UZ", that is, the name for the Sky-God OGUZ has been obliterated.
This is just like reading the Sumerian word "TUR" as "MAR" which I
pointed out in Part-1 of this series. Such alterations wiped out the
Sumerian-Turkish kinship altogether, and facilitated the usurpation of
the Sumero-Turkish civilization by the Akkadians.
Evidently the Sumerian "dingir ZU-EN" or "dingir EN-ZU", which is
asociated with "water", is the same as Turkish "Tengir SU-HAN" (Tengir
Han-Su) meaning "God Water-Lord". Turkish "SU-HAN" or "DENIZ-HAN" (Sea
Lord) was the name of one of the six sons of OGUZ-KAGAN in the Turkish
epic. The names of the six sons were: GÜN-HAN (Sun-Lord), AY-HAN
(Moon-Lord), ILDUZ-HAN (Star-Lord), GÖK-HAN (Sky-Lord), DAG-HAN
(Mountain-Lord), and DENIZ-HAN (Sea-Lord). By the way, even the
English term "SEA" is fabricated from Turkish "SU" meaning "water".
Thus "ZUEN" (EN-ZU), i.e., "HAN-SU" and "HAN-UZ" (HAN-OGUZ) are
religiously related concepts - in Sumero-Turkish.
b) However, associating "ZU-EN" ("Water-Lord" (SU-HAN)) with the "Moon"
or "Moon-God" concept requires much stretching of the "water" concept
unless there is some other concept that is related to both the
Lord-Water" and "Lord-Moon. This other concept is again the Turkish
name "UZ" (OGUZ) as we will demonstrate below.
About the name ZUEN, as we noted above, John L. Hayes gives the
following information: [29]
"ZUEN This seems to be another name of NANNA, although it is not clear
why he had two names. Jacobsen thinks that the term NANNA refers
specifically to the god's role as the "full moon", and ZUEN refers to
his role as the "crescent moon". It has also been suggested that ZUEN
is the Akkadian equivalent of Sumerian NANNA; that is, they are two
different names for the same deity. However, there is no obvious
Semitic etymology for ZUEN.
The Akkadian equivalent of this DN is usually transcribed as either
"SIN" or "SUEN". The Sumerian word was also borrowed into Akkadian as a
common noun, appearing as SINU, SUENU, SINNU, and ShINNU. It is
glossed by the CAD as: "1) the moon 2) crescent shaped-shaped or
semi-circular object". [30]
These excerpts indicate that The Sumerian "ZU-EN" was related to the
Moon-Lord (Moon-God) also. This can only be when the Sumerian sign
which is read as "ZU" is also the Turkish word "UZ" which is another
Turkish name for "OGUZ" the Sky-God, "AGUZ" meaning "mouth", "UZ" (US)
meaning "wisdom", and "UZ (ÜZ, YÜZ) meaning "face". This is most
important to note. Thus by reading the Sumerian sign as ZU rather than
"UZ" in the Sumerian texts, they also eliminated the ancient Turanian
Sky-God's name "OGUZ" and the Turkish religious concepts associated
with this name.
As John L. Hayes writes: "The moon-god was also referred to as ZUEN."
[31]
This is only possible when the Sumerian signs which have been read as
"ZU-EN" (Turkish SU-HAN) are read as "UZ-EN" (Turkish UZ-HAN - i.e.,
OGUZ-HAN). Then, using Turkish, one can have a "moon" content
associated with the name ZUEN. In ancient writings, God's name was
generally hidden behind other names. For example, in ancient Masar
(Misir, "Egypt"), SOBEK was identified as the "crocodile-god". The
name SOBEK is another Turkish name like the Sumerian ZU-EN or EN-ZU.
SOBEK is defined as: "a crocodile-god, was worshipped in cities that
depended on water, such as the oasis city of CROKODILOPOLIS, where the
reptiles were kept in pools and adorned with jewels". [32]
The name SOBEK consists of "SO + BEK" which are Turkish "SU + BEK
(BEY)" meaning "Water-Lord". Thus Sumerian ZU, Masarian SO and Turkish
SU meaning "water" are all one and the same and are all Turkish. Now
metaphorically it can be said that the crocodile is the "lord" of the
water in a water-body such as the river Nile or in the rivers of
Amazon. Without question, the crocodile is the ruler of the water
where it lives.
Related to the name SOBEK is the Turkish name "OS-BEK" (USBEK, ÖZBEK,
UZBEK, OUZBEK, OGUZ-BEK, OGUZ-BEY) meaning "UZ-Lord, OGUZ-Lord" which
refers to the ancient Turanian Sky-God OGUZ. It must be noted that one
of the Central Asiatic Turkish states have the name "OZBEKISTAN", that
is, the country of OSBEK (ÖZBEK, UZBEK, USBEK, OSBEK) Turks.
Of course this identification makes Turkish as old as the ancient
Sumerians and Masarians.
Now returning back to the Sumerian name "dingir.ZUEN", it is clear that
this Sumerian name is another form of the Turkish name "Tengir SU-HAN".
However, hidden behind this name is the name US-HAN (UZ-HAN, OGUZ
HAN).
Furthermore, in order to understand and make the connection between
these God concepts, one should remember that in ancient Turanian
understanding, the Sun and Moon were regarded as the eyes of the
Sky-Father-God OGUZ or TUR. Hence Sun and Moon were one and the same
as the Sky-Father-God. Of course, the "eyes" are inseparable parts of
the ONE whole unity, that is, the universal Sky-God concept.
Additionally, it must be noted that the "Crescent Moon" in the sky
appears as a "smiling mouth" (Turkish AGUZ), while the waxing and
waning phases of the moon appear as an "eye" (Turkish GÖZ) and the
full moon appears as a "face" (Turkish "AG-UZ" (AK-YÜZ)) of a
"sky-moon-man". All of this is possible and occurs because of the
multiple identities that the Turkish name OGUZ represents. The Moon
was not the only "OGUZ" (O-GÖZ) in the sky. The Sun was also OGUZ
(O-GÖZ) in the sky in addition to the Sky-Father-God. Sumerologists,
by reading the Sumerian sign as ZU, rather than UZ, eliminated all of
these ancient Sumero-Turkish concepts.
The Sky-God OGUZ had six sons having the names of: GÜN-HAN (Sun-Lord),
AY-HAN (Moon-Lord), ILDUZ-HAN (Star-Lord), GÖK-HAN (Sky-Lord), DAG-HAN
(Mountain-Lord), and DENIZ-HAN (Sea-Lord, water-Lord). All of these
names are different appearing representations of ONE UNIVERSAL SKY-GOD
OGUZ under different names, such as Sumerian "ZUEN" (SU-HAN) which
hides the universal Sky-God's name "UZ-HAN" (OGUZ-HAN).
Now with this background knowledge, let us examine the Sumerian text
read as "dingir.AMAR-dingir.ZUEN" and translated as "AMAR-SIN" (see
attached Sumerian text). In the Sumerian word when we replace the name
"AMAR" with "TUR" we get the Sumerian expression
"dingir.TUR-dingir.ZU-EN" which becomes the same as the easily
recognizable Turkish expression "Tengir TUR-Tengir SU-HAN" meaning
"God-TUR God Lord-Water". In this context, again Sumerian and Turkish
are the same.
In the Sumerian text first line, if we read the second "dingir" sign as
"AN" meaning "sky", the text of the first line becomes "dingir.TUR-AN
ZU-EN" which is the Turkish expression "Tengir TUR-AN SU-HAN" meaning
"God TUR of Sky is God Water" or "Sky-God TUR is God-Water" which is a
correct concept because Sky-God (Gok Tanri) also delivers water (rain,
snow, ice) from the sky. This again makes the Sumerian and Turkish
expressions and concepts the same because Sumerian "TUR" is "AMAR",
"ZU" is "water" and "EN" is "lord". It should be noted that the
Sumerian text is written as "EN-ZU" but somehow it has been read as
"ZU-EN" which is in the same format that it appears in Turkish as
indicated above.
Now let us read the Sumerian sign that has been read "ZU" as "UZ", then
we get the following picture for the first line of Sumerian text:
"dingir.TUR-AN EN-UZ" which is the same as Turkish expression
"Tengir.TUR-AN HAN-UZ" (Tengir TUR AN HAN OGUZ) meaning "God TUR of Sky
is Lord Oguz". Thus the whole expression in both Sumerian and Turkish
is again Turanian and Turkish and describes the ancient Turanian
Sky-God as TUR and as OGUZ.
Additionally, when we read "TUR" and "AN" together, the Sumerian
expression becomes "dingir TURAN HAN-UZ" which is the Turkish
expression "TENGIR TURAN HAN-UZ" ("TANRI TURAN HAN-OGUZ" veya "TANRI
TURAN OGUZ-HAN") meaning "GOD of TURAN is LORD OGUZ". This again
clearly Identifies God UZ (OGUZ) with Turanian Oguz and TUR peoples.
It must be noted that the names TUR and TURAN are present in this
Sumerian text although they have been intentionally obliterated. All
of this obviously makes the Sumerians Tur/Turk people from Turan
(Central Asia).
The Semitic Akkadians and their followers tried to avoid reading these
Turkic names (i.e., TUR, TURAN, UZ, OGUZ) in the Sumerian texts and if
possible to bury them forever by changing the original Turkish
expression into "dingir.AMAR-dingir.ZUEN" AMAR-SIN. But the truth has
its own way of coming to the surface. It is clear that even changing
the place of a consonant, such as in the Turkish UZ becoming ZU (SU),
makes a mountain of a difference. The cabalist manipulator priests knew
this fact.
All of these also indicate that Turanian Tur/Turk peoples everywhere
had the concept of ONE UNIVERSAL SKY-GOD thousands of years before the
so-called "Monotheistic God" religions were initiated by the so-called
"Semites". Evidently, this Turanian concept was also
borrowed-without-permission.
***
The name SIN is defined as: "an early god of the moon, son of ENLIL and
husband of NINGAL. Sin's bright light kept watch against evil forces
in the night. When UTUKKU succeeded in extinguishing his brilliance
with the help of ISHTAR and SHAMASH, MARDUK fought off the attackers
and brought back the eclipsed light of SIN". [33]
If the SIN is Semitic for "moon" as we are told, and since "AMAR" (in
one meaning, Turkish "EMER") means "young", then AMAR.SIN would mean
"Young Moon" referring to the "crescent moon" which embellishes the
flags of Turkish peoples to this day. In this metaphorical context, the
"crescent moon" represents the horns of a "young black bull" whose body
is not visible. AMAR-SIN is described as "young bull".
Yet, in spite of this, identifying SIN as "a god of moon" is
intentional disinformation. This identification is not telling the
truth about its original meaning and its Turkish source. The
explanation we are being given does not tell the whole story. It only
tells the altered "Akkadian" version.
Let us examine the term dingir AMAR.SIN. The origin of AMAR-SIN is in
the Turkish expression "MA-ARSIN" (Ma Ersin, Ma Er Sen) meaning:
a) "Moon Man you are" ("you are Moon Man"). Therefore, the "moon"
aspect of "AMAR-SIN" is coming from Turkish "MA", not from "SIN" as
portrayed. Thus AMAR-SIN is a word that has its origin in Turkish
rather than Semitic which did not even exist before they started to
manufacture Akkadian from Sumero-Turkish.
The word "MA" corresponding to the Turkish name "AY" meaning "Moon" is
also indicated in Turkish OGUZ-KAGAN epic [34]. But Turkish expression
MA-Tengri" not only means "Moon-God" but also refers to the Magnificent
Sky-Father-God and the Magnificent Sun-God all of which are represented
by the name TUR.
b) "You are Magnificent Man" referring to the ancient Turanian
Sky-Father-God, where "MA" means "magnificent", AR/ER means "man", and
SIN (SEN) means "you" or "you are". In this context, when the Sumerian
text is read as "dingir.MA-ER-dingir ZU-EN", it is the same
as the Turkish expression "tengir.MA ER tengir.SU HAN" (Deniz Han)
literally meaning "God Magnificent Man is God Water Lord". Water is an
essential element of nature, just like air ("hava" in Turkish), without
which there would be no life as we know of.
However, if the Sumerian text is read as "dingir.MA-ER-dingir.EN-UZ"
then it becomes the Turkish expression "Tengir MA ER Tengir HAN-UZ
(OGUZ)" meaning "God Magnificent Man God Lord OGUZ" which defines the
ancient Turanian supreme creator Sky-God Han-Oguz (or Oguz-Han) which
includes not only the Sun-God and Moon-God but is regarded as the
omnipotent universal Sky-Father-God.
Evidently, this similarity between the Turkic words "ZU" and "UZ" has
been subject to deliberate confusion. Of course, when the UZ aspect of
the Sumerian text is not brought to the surface, then its Turkish
religious content is obliterated altogether. When Turkish "MA-AR" (MA
ER) is read as "AMAR", and "UZ" is read as "ZU", this amounts to
intentional misreading and misnaming.
It is important to bring to the attention of the reader the Sumerian
word "ZU" which has the meaning of "to know" or "wisdom" [35] It is
interesting to note that Turkish "US" (UZ) also means "wisdom,
knowledge". This is not due to coincidence. The peculiar thing is that
these words (ZU and UZ) are opposites of each other in format, yet they
have similar religious meanings. The implication of this is that those
who read and translated the Sumerian signs somehow changed the meanings
and/or formats around so that many of the original Sumero-Turkish words
could not be identified with the Turkish language. The important
question here is, how did the Sumerologists determine that the Sumerian
sign was vocalized as ZU - rather than UZ? Could it be that they used
the Turkish language as a reference to decode and understand the
Sumerian sign but then transcribed the sign as ZU instead of UZ?
***
Returning once more to Sumerian Texts 13a and/or 13b of John L. Hayes'
book, for example, the first three lines in each case are extremely
important. John L. Hayes reports about the readings of Lines 1-3 as
follows:
Line 1: Transliterated as "dingir.AMAR-dingir.ZUEN", transcribed as
"AMARZUEN", and translated as "AMAR-SIN".
Line 2: Transliterated as NIBRU.(ki).A, transcribed as "NIBRU.A", and
translated as "PROPOSED BY ENLIL IN NIPPUR".
John L. Hayes also writes: [36] "The Sumerian pronounciation of the
name of the city of Nippur is known from lexical lists, where
EN-LIL(ki) is spelled out as NI-IB-RU. Similarly, the Akkadian
pronounciation of the city is also known from lexical lists, where it
is spelled out as NI-IP-PU-RU."
My note: the Sumerian signs of this line reads "EN-IL-KI-A". To get
the name NIPPUR from it requires a lot of imagination unless they
substituted a replacement that had similar meaning. In other words,
they are not reporting or telling us what is actually present in the
Sumerian line but rather the NIPPUR replacement.
Sumerian "EN-IL-KI-A" is Turkic "HAN-IL KÖY'E" or "HAN-IL GÖYE"
(IL-HAN KÖYE/GÖYE) meaning "King to village" or "King to sky"
respectively. Since the first line talks about the Sky-God TUR and UZ
(OGUZ), it follows that this line refers to "King to Sky" (Lord to
Sky). "Lord to Sky" referring to Sky-God has another description in
Turkish, that ia, "HAN BIR O" meaning "Only Him is Lord". This would
properly translate into Sumerian writing as "EN-BI-RU". But this is
very much the same as the given Sumerian name "NI-IB-RU" which seems to
have some intentional alterations done to it. Both the Sumerian
"NI-IB-RU" and Akkadian "NI-IP-PU-RU" sound very much like the name "AN
HEBREW" (Sky Lord BIR-O) which the Jews have falsely claimed as a name
for themselves. In other words, the Tur/Turk Sumerian text has been
anagrammatized, Semitized and usurped.
The Turkish expression "HAN BIR O" (AN BIR-O) has two meanings: 1)
"Only Him is Lord" referring to the Sky-God which I indicated above; 2)
"Palace of the Lord" where Turkish "HAN" also means "complex of a large
building" which a Lord's palace is. Similarly, Turkish "HAN" (AN) also
refers to "sky" where the Sky-God resides. After all, the Sky is a
|City" or "Palace" to the Sky God. Either the scholars do not know this
Turkic concept, which is likely, or they know but do not wish to dwell
on it.
There is another case similar to the misreading of "NI-IB-RU" (Tr.
"EN-BIR-U") and that is the reading of the name "PER-U" (BIR-O) of
ancient Masarian (falsely called "Egyptian") kings. This Masarian
(Misir) word read as "PER-U" is the Turkish expression "BIR-O"
referring to the ancient Turanian "One Sky-God". The Tur/Turk Masarian
Pharoahs, by calling themselves PERU (BIRO), were deifying themselves
as God on earth. Additionally, PER-O refers to their palaces as Great
House (BIR-ÖY, ESSIZ-ÖY). PERU also refers to the "sky" which is
also "BIR ÖY" meaning "one-house".
The title Pharaoh is defined as: [Late Latin "Pharao", from Greek
"Pharao", from Hebrew "Par'oh", from Egypt "PR-'O" meaning "great
house".] A title of the sovereigns of ancient Egypt; Pharaoh used in
the Bible as proper name. [37]
Evidently scholars have not been totally truthful in reading this
Masarian text either, because it was the Turkish expression "BIR-O"
describing the Sky-God (Gök-Tanri), and "BIR-OY" (bir öy) meaning
"one house" or "great house" referring to both the Sky" and the
"palace" of the Pharaoh. Clearly the ancient Indo-Europeans and Semites
anagrammatized, restructured and disguised this ancient Tur/Tur
Masarian name in order to distance it from Turks and Turkish.
So the Sumerian "NI-IB-RU", Masarian "PER-O" and Turkish "BIR-O" and
"HAN BIR-O" are one and the same and they are all Turkish in origin
contrary to all kinds of distortion attached to them. With this
explanation, it is doubtfull that the meaning of NIPPUR has been
explained truthfully by the Sumerologists.
Line 3: Transliterated as "dingir.EN-LIL-LE", transcribed as "ENLIL.E".
Yet the signs in Line 3 read as "dingir.EN-IL-LE". The Sumerian
"EN-IL" and Turkish "HAN-IL" are one and the same and mean the "Lord of
the Country", that is, the "king". On the other hand, in order to be
able to get the "wind" concept into this Sumerian/Turkish expression,
one has to read the Sumerian writing "dingir.EN IL-LE" as Turkish
"dingir HEN ILLI" (HAN YELLI) meaning "God Lord windy". Only then could
the Sumerologist attach the "wind" concept to this
Sumero-Turkish expression.
This indicates that the so-called Akkadian "ENLIL" is nothing but a
misread Turkish expression. However this Turkish etymology has never
been mentioned until now as I reveal it to the readers.
Of course it is said that the Sumerian word "LIL" means "wind" [38] It
is curious that the Turkish word "YIL" (YEL) also means "wind". Now,
what reader would stop to ask, how did the Sumerologist determine that
this Sumerian sign was vocalized as LIL rather than YEL as in Turkish?
Would readers even suspect that intentional misreading was being done?
Of course not We have another similar case where we are told that
Sumerian "LAL" [39] means "honey". But Turkish "BAL" also means
"honey". How do we know that the original Sumerian word was not BAL
but rather LAL - as it is presented?
In regards to these three lines of Sumerian text, it seems that line 2
and Line 3 have been combined to give a manufactured meaning of:
"PROPOSED BY ENLIL IN NIPPUR". The implication of the presentation of
these three lines together with Line 4, is that most likely, some
Babylonian cabalist priests gathered in a place, possibly they called
"Nippur", where they proposed and decided among themselves, quite
self-servingly, that they would transcribe and call the Sumerian name
written in Line-1 as "AMARZUEN" and translate it as "AMAR-SIN". and
then portray this changeover in such a way that as if the Wind-God
Enlil himself ordered or proposed it. There seems to be a use of
sophistry and mythological fabrication here.
***
John L. Hayes writes the following regarding "ZUEN", "SIN" and "AMAR"
relations: [40]
"The Akkadian equivalent of this DN is usually transcribed as either
"SIN" or "SUEN". The Sumerian word was also borrowed into Akkadian as a
common noun, appearing as SINU, SUENU, SINNU, and ShINNU. It is
glossed by the CAD as: "1) the moon 2) crescent shaped-shaped or
semi-circular object.
AMAR-(d)ZUEN Etymologically, "young bull of Zuen", amar.Zuen.(ak). The
name of this ruler is often transcribed "Amar-Sin" or "Amar-Zuen",
which are really Akkadianized transcriptions."
Sumerian or Akkadian common nouns, appearing as SINU, SUENU, SINNU, and
ShINNU may be matched with Turkish words and/or expressions as follows:
SINU (< "SIN-U"): Turkish "SEN O" meaning "You are Him/Her/It" which is
a reference to the ancient Turanian trinity Sky-God Oguz concept.
SUENU (< "SU-EN-U"): Turkish "SU HANU" meaning "Water Lord" which is
the same as Sumerian "ZU-EN" but does not refer to the moon.
SINNU (< "SIN-NU"): Turkish "SIN ANU" (SEN HAN O) meaning "You are
that Lord" which again refers to the Sky-God Oguz-Tur concept, and
ShINNU (< "SH-IN-NU"): Turkish "ISI-HAN ANU' meaning "Lord Light / Lord
Warmth is ANU" where reference is made to Sun and Moon and the creator
Sky-God ANU.
It is clear that there is much more than the "moon" concept in these
expressions. By bringing forward only: 1) the moon, 2) crescent shaped
or semi-circular object" aspect of them obliterates all the others and
keeps only the Moon related ones. As John L. Hayes also says, these
are really Akkadianized transcriptions, more correctly, they are
"anagrammatized" Turkic expressions without reference to Tur, Turan or
Turkish.
John L. Hays also gives us the following: [41]
"Early scholars believed that this PN was Akkadian. The Akkadian
equivalent of AMAR is BURU. Therefore, the name appears in some older
secondary literature as "BUR-SIN", or something similar. Almost all
modern scholars believe that the name is Sumerian, although there is
really not much evidence to prove this."
Again the names AMAR, BURU and BUR-SIN look suspiciously Turkish.
AMAR (< "AM-AR"): Turkish "MA ER" meaning "Magnificent MAN" and/or
"Moon Man".
BURU (< "BUR-U"): Turkish "BIR O" the name of the ancient Turanian
trinity Sky-Father-God , Sun-God and Moon-God.
BUR-SIN: Turkish "BIRSIN" meaning "You are One" again referring to the
ancient Turanian trinity Sky-Father-God, Sun-God and Moon-God (not just
the Moon-God).
Thus again we see that there has been a fraudulent game perpetrated in
order to wipe away the Turkish content, that is, the one language that
the world spoke at that time.
Evidently, the supposedly Semitic word "SIN" meaning "moon or moon-god"
could not readily be derived from "dingir.TUR-AN-ZUEN" unless some
intentional manipulation took place.
There is another possible source for connecting "SIN" to "TUR and hence
to "Moon". It is in the "Semitic" name "Mount SINAI" which is known in
Turkish as "TUR Dagi" meaning "Mount TUR". The name "SINAI" is made up
with two Turkish words, that is, "SIN" (SEN) meaning "you" or "you
are", and "AI" (AY) meaning "moon". Thus the word "SINAI", analyzed in
Turkish, means "You are Moon" indicating that this mountain has been
named after the Turkish name for "Moon". It seems that this mountain
name and the name of "SINAI" peninsula must have been "TUR mountain"
and "TUR peninsula" in very ancient times before the name was changed
to SINAI. This was so because before "Semites" ever had power to
control any area, the whole so-called Middle East was in use by the
ancient Turanian peoples. It is no wonder that in ancient times the
Arabian peninsula was called "TURIYE" or "TUR ÖY" meaning "home of
TURs". [42]
In manufacturing the name SINAI, the SIN (SEN) component has been
labelled as "moon" instead of the "AI" (AY) component. Thus the "moon"
concept has been wrongly or intentionally given to the element of "SIN"
rather than the "AY". Thus wrongfully, SIN has been allocated the
meaning "moon" or "moon-god" in Akkadian and other Semitic languages.
Again we see here that there has been an abduction of Turanian
civilization by way of anagrammatizing, that is switching or shuffling
words, word components and their meanings.
In ancient Turanian world, "Moon" was regarded as the "left blind eye"
of the Sky-God TUR. However the "full moon" was quite a showy "eye" of
TUR as the sun's rays were reflected from its face onto Earth. Hence
the Moon-God was also TUR, that is, the Sky-God.
The ancient Semites choosing the name of "Mount SINAI", Arabic "Jebel
MUSA" and Turkish "TUR Dagi" for this mountain is meaningful. It
indicates that the original name of this mountain was Turkic "TUR" and
"TUR" meant "Moon", and Semitic names were derived from the original
Turkic name. The name MOSES (MUSA) is supposed to have had his talk
with God at the top of this mountain. At the top of a mountain one can
talk either to himself or to the sound of the wind. The ancient Semites
believed and worshipped not only the Wind-God ENLIL (Turkish "HAN-YIL"
or "HAN-YILLI"), they also believed in the "moon", particularly the
"dark moon" as a supreme deity.
CONCLUSIONS:
We have shown that the Sumerian "Dingir. AMAR-Dingir ZUEN" translated
as AMAR-SIN has its origin in Turkish. We also showed that Sumerian and
Turkish were not only related to each other, but that most likely
Turkish was an earlier language.
After the Semitic Akkadians invaded Sumer, the Sumerian language,
pantheon and mythology went through endless deliberate alterations and
usurpations. The artificial "Akkadian" language was manufactured using
Sumero-Turkish words and phrases as source material for coming up with
words for a language that they called "Akkadian" which served as a
model for other "Semitic" languages.
It is fair to say that a misrepresentation of the original
Turkish-Sumerian language has been perpetrated since ancient times by
obliterating Turkish names like TUR, TURAN, UZ (OGUZ), US, ZU (SU), HAN
and many others, and reading the Sumero-Turkish texts and/or Turkish
words/phrases and attributing them to Semitic Akkadian or
Assyro-Babylonian while ignoring their real Turanian Turkic origin.
This kind of misrepresentation wiped away the most ancient Turan
civilization, and replaced it falsely with a Semitic and Indo-European
one. Thus we are all conned and misled.
It is clear that the readings of ancient Sumerian texts have been
distorted, particularly with respect to the ancient Turanian Tur/Turk
civilization. Sumerian is not a dead language as we are told. Sumerian
is still alive in Turkish. The starting point for Sumerology, that is,
the study of Sumerian language and Sumerian civilization, has to be
viewed together with Turkish language and Turanian civilization. This
cannot be avoided anymore.
REFERENCES:
[20] C. J. GADD, "A Sumerian Reading-Book", an Assistant in the
Department of Egyptian and Assyrian Antquities, the British Museum,
Oxford at Clarendon Press, 1924, p. 183.
[21] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", Undena
Publications, Malibu, 1990, p. 147.
[22] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 147.
[23] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 151
with reference to Text 13b.
[24] Edgar H. Sturtevant, "A Hittite Glossary", Yale University, The
Linguistic Society of America, 1936, p. 35.
[25] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 117.
[26] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 157.
[27] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 157.
[28] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 157.
[29] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 147.
[30] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 147.
[31] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 26.
[32] Lionel Casson and The TIME-LIFE Books, Ancient Egypt", Time
Incorporated, New York, 1965, p. 185.
[33] Rhoda A. Hendricks, "Mythologies of the World A Concise
Encyclopedia", McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1973, p. 178.
[34] Huseyin Namik ORKON, "Eski Türk Yazitlari", Türk Dil Kurumu
Yayinlari: 529, Ankara, 1987, p. 877.
[35] C. J. GADD, "A Sumerian Reading-Book", Oxford at Clarendon Press,
1924, p. 194.
[36] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 153.
[37] Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Fifth Edition, 1947, p. 744.
[38] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 286.
[39] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 286.
[40] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 147.
[41] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 147.
[42] "Türk Dünyasi El Kitabi, Cilt I", Türk Kültürünü Arastirma
Enstitüsü Yayinlari No. 121, 1992, p. 107.
Best wishes to all,
Polat Kaya
22/01/2005
(Copyright © 2005 Polat Kaya)
============= End of Part-2; to be continued in Part-3 ============
The reader is cordially invited to visit Polat Kaya Library for other
writings at URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Polat_Kaya/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Polat_Kaya/join
---------------------------------------------------------------------
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------------------------------------------------------------
----- "Biz Çevirmenlere N'oluyor!" bilgi topluluklari, ------------
----- allingus'un kültür hizmetlerinden biridir. Mayis 2001 ------
----- ***@yahoo.com; ***@gmail.com --------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-- allingus Çeviri Hizmetleri \ / allingus Translation Services --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bcn_2004/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
bcn_2004-***@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Polat Kaya" <***@COMPMORE.NET>
To: <***@yahoogroups.com>;
<***@yahoogroups.com>; <***@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 7:45 PM
Subject: [bcn2004] Part-2 Turkish-Sumerian Kinship: Was it
"Dingir.AMAR-Dingir.ZUEN", "Tengir.TURAN ZU-HAN (SU-HAN)" or
"Tengir.TURAN UZ-HAN (OGUZ-HAN)"?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Part-2 Turkish-Sumerian Kinship: Was it "Dingir.AMAR-Dingir.ZUEN",
"Tengir.TURAN ZU-HAN (SU-HAN)" or "Tengir.TURAN UZ-HAN (OGUZ-HAN)"?
By POLAT KAYA
---------------------------------------------------------------------
About the name AMAR-SIN (AMAR-ZUEN):
In Part-1 of this series of writings, we talked about how the Sumerian
sign meaning TUR had somehow been read as MAR - as pointed out by C. J.
Gadd, and we talked about the supposedly "Akkadian" name "MARDUK".
Reinserting the original Sumerian TUR back into MARDUK then made it
clearly Turkic TURDUK. It has become even further clear that the "DUK"
in the name "MARDUK" is actually a reversal of the Turkish word "KUD"
(KUT) meaning "sacred, divine, holy". Thus the fabricated name
"MARDUK", referring to the Supreme God or the Sun God of Babylon, when
viewed as TURKUD, would mean "TUR is Sacred" or "Sacred TUR", i.e.,
"Sacred Bull". This is the same as the Turkish "TUR-KUD" or "TUR-KUT"
TURGUD). The Turkish name TURGUD is a widely used masculine name in
the Turkish world, evidently originating from this ancient Turanian
Sky-God's name (TUR-KUT). Thus, the name "MARDUK", before it was
usurped from Sumero-Turkish culture and traditions, was probably
"TUR-KUD" (TUR-KUT, TUR-GUD) or "KUT-TUR" (GUD-TUR) meaning "Sacred
Sky-God TUR". We must also note here that "GUD" in Sumerian was "Bull".
[20] Therefore, while in one sense, TUR-GUD (TUR-KUT) was
"SACRED-TUR" referring to the Holy Sky God but in another sense,
TUR-GUD, where GUD is Sumerian BULL, was "SKY-GOD TUR the BULL". In
Turkish, UD or UT is also Cattle so Sumerian GUD and Turkish UD are
linguistically akin.
Now it is important that we examine another Sumerian name called
"dingir.AMAR dingir.ZUEN" which has been changed into Akkadian as
AMAR-SIN - another important misrepresentation. But before I go into
discussing it I would like to say that I will be referring to some
Sumerian texts given in the book entitled "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar
and Texts" by John L. Hayes (JLH). In this discussion I will be dealing
with the first few lines of the text (See Attachment Sumer_Text 13a).
Additionally, I would like to make it clear that in my discussions I
may be critical of certain readings of Sumerian texts in general,
however, these should not be taken as my criticisim of John L. Hayes or
his book. In fact I commend him for writing such an excellent book on
the Sumerian language. He has provided us with excellent and most
candid explanations. As a reader of his book, I am grateful that he has
written what he has written in the way he saw it. He asks very valid
questions and explains them to the benefit of the reader. His straight
and candid explanations are appreciated.
About the name ZUEN, John L. Hayes gives the following information:
[21]
"ZUEN This seems to be another name of NANNA, although it is not clear
why he had two names. Jacobsen thinks that the term NANNA refers
specifically to the god's role as the "full moon", and ZUEN refers to
his role as the "crescent moon". It has also been suggested that ZUEN
is the Akkadian equivalent of Sumerian NANNA; that is, they are two
different names for the same deity. However, there is no obvious
Semitic etymology for ZUEN.
The Akkadian equivalent of this DN is usually transcribed as either
"SIN" or "SUEN". The Sumerian word was also borrowed into Akkadian as a
common noun, appearing as SINU, SUENU, SINNU, and ShINNU. It is
glossed by the CAD as: "1) the moon 2) crescent shaped or semi-circular
object". [22]
"AMAR-(d)ZUEN Etymologically, "young bull of Zuen", amar.Zuen.(ak).
The name of this ruler is often transcribed "Amar-Sin" or "Amar-Zuen",
which are really Akkadianized transcriptions.
Early scholars believed that this PN was Akkadian. The Akkadian
equivalent of AMAR is BURU. Therefore, the name appears in some older
secondary literature as "BUR-SIN", or something similar. Almost all
modern scholars believe that the name is Sumerian, although there is
really not much evidence to prove this."
All of these names mentioned in the above given excerpt from Hayes are
extremely important from the Turkish point of view, because not only
were they were Sumerian but they were also Turkish in origin and are
related to the Turkish UZ-HAN (OGUZ-HAN), SU-HAN, and AY-HAN names.
Evidently they were borrowed-without-permission, anagrammatized and
disguised by the Akkadians.
The Akkadian usurpation of Sumero-Turkish deity names led eventually to
the creation of Judeo-Christianity religions and the death of the
ancient Turanian Sky-God Oguz/Tur religion from which they took all of
their tenets.
Regarding the name AMAR-SIN, John L. Hayes writes the following
regarding the Sumerian Text 13a: [23]
"Line 1. As was the case with Shulgi, the name AMAR-SIN is preceded by
the determinative for divine names. There are thus two divine
determinatives in the line: the second is for DN ZUEN, and the first
is for the PN Amar-d.Zuen.
Lines 2-4. These lines form a relative clause modifying Amar-Sin of
Line 1. mu means "name", and pad is something like "to reveal".
mu....pad is a compound verb, meaning approximately "to propose". The
underlying idea is that the name Amar-Sin was proposed by Enlil in the
council of the gods, meeting Nippur, to be the king of Sumer and
Akkad."
{Note: DN stands for Divinity Name, and PN stands for Personal Name
(proper name)}.
This indicates that Sumerian "dingir.AMAR-dingir.ZUEN" was not
"AMAR-SIN" to begin with. It was taken from Sumerian and/or Turkish,
reformatted and renamed to make it "Akkadian".
The question that comes to mind here is that in reading Sumerian text,
what justification did they have for coming up with the name AMAR-SIN
from a name that they first read as "dingir.AMAR-dingir.ZUEN" while it
was actually written in Sumerian as "dingir.TUR-dingir.EN-ZU (or
EN-UZ)" or "dingir.TUR-AN-EN-ZU (or EN- UZ)"? The Sumerian word "EN"
meaning "lord" is the Turkish word "HAN" meaning "lord". Additionally,
the Sumerian sign that has been read as "ZU" most likely was also "UZ"
which has been avoided up to now. It has very important implications
which I will discuss below.
Incidentally, here it is important to note that the supposedly
"Akkadian" word for Sumerian "EN" was "BELUTU". [24] When we examine
this "Akkadian" "BELUTU", we find that it is very similar to the
Turkish expression "BEILUTU" (BEYLI IDI) meaning "he who is with
lordship". In fact, this similarity is too close to be a coincidence.
Obviously Akkadians were anagrammatizing Turkish words then. This is an
indication that Turkish was present in Sumerian times and was a fully
developed language with root words and suffixes. In this Akkadian
anagram of Turkish, Turkish BEI (BEY) meaning "lord" has been reduced
to "BE", and the remaining LU and TU has been kept as they are in
Turkish.
Turkish LU is a suffix meaning "with" and TU (UTU/UDU/IDI) which is the
name of SUN-God) means "it is". Turkish siffix "TU" is another form of
Turkish suffix "TUR" meaning "it is" which was the name of "Sky-God".
These most frequently used Turkish suffixes alone make
Turkish "The SUN LANGUAGE" (UTU (OD O) LANGUAGE) and "TUR LANGUAGE".
a) First of all the Sumerian sign which is read as "ZU" by
Sumerologists is the sign for "water" which is "SU" in Turkish. It is
not believable that those who deciphered an unknown and so-called "dead
language", using the misleading language of Akkadian, did not know that
Sumerian "ZU" and Turkish "SU" were one and the same. That they knew
but would not admit that "ZU" was Turkish "SU". Hence they avoided
using the name Turkish. The Sumerian sign for "ZU" is also present in
the Sumerian names NINGIRSU [25], and ABZU ("apsu") [26] although
with some differences in the signs and meanings. The meaning for
"ABZU" ("apsu") is indicated as "water basin" [27].
Additionally, the Sumerian term ZU and its sign are very much related
to Turkish word "UZ" which is the Turkish name for Sky-God "OGUZ" and
the Oguz (Tur/Turk) peoples. Yet the Sumerologists have dwelled only on
the ZU (SU) , i.e., "water" aspect of the sign. For example, in one
meaning, the Sumerian word "ABZU" or "APSU" means "Father-Water"
obviously from Turkish "APA-SU".
With this background, then the Sumerian signs that have been read as
"ZU-EN" would have been the Turkish "SU-HAN (or HAN-SU) meaning "Lord
Waters" which equates it with "ABZU" (APSU or APA-SU).
John L. Hayes writes the following: [28]
"ABZU This is composed of two signs, the ZU-sign followed by the
AB-sign . However, it is known that the AB-sign was read before the
ZU-sign. That is, the word was pronounced something like /abzu/. The
phenomenon is similar to that of the DN ZUEN, which was pronounced
/zuen/, although written EN-ZU. In older transliterations it may appear
as "ZU-AB."
This explanation shows that these two names, i.e., ABZU and ZUEN, have
gone through some intentional confusion. In the process, the Turkish
name "UZ", that is, the name for the Sky-God OGUZ has been obliterated.
This is just like reading the Sumerian word "TUR" as "MAR" which I
pointed out in Part-1 of this series. Such alterations wiped out the
Sumerian-Turkish kinship altogether, and facilitated the usurpation of
the Sumero-Turkish civilization by the Akkadians.
Evidently the Sumerian "dingir ZU-EN" or "dingir EN-ZU", which is
asociated with "water", is the same as Turkish "Tengir SU-HAN" (Tengir
Han-Su) meaning "God Water-Lord". Turkish "SU-HAN" or "DENIZ-HAN" (Sea
Lord) was the name of one of the six sons of OGUZ-KAGAN in the Turkish
epic. The names of the six sons were: GÜN-HAN (Sun-Lord), AY-HAN
(Moon-Lord), ILDUZ-HAN (Star-Lord), GÖK-HAN (Sky-Lord), DAG-HAN
(Mountain-Lord), and DENIZ-HAN (Sea-Lord). By the way, even the
English term "SEA" is fabricated from Turkish "SU" meaning "water".
Thus "ZUEN" (EN-ZU), i.e., "HAN-SU" and "HAN-UZ" (HAN-OGUZ) are
religiously related concepts - in Sumero-Turkish.
b) However, associating "ZU-EN" ("Water-Lord" (SU-HAN)) with the "Moon"
or "Moon-God" concept requires much stretching of the "water" concept
unless there is some other concept that is related to both the
Lord-Water" and "Lord-Moon. This other concept is again the Turkish
name "UZ" (OGUZ) as we will demonstrate below.
About the name ZUEN, as we noted above, John L. Hayes gives the
following information: [29]
"ZUEN This seems to be another name of NANNA, although it is not clear
why he had two names. Jacobsen thinks that the term NANNA refers
specifically to the god's role as the "full moon", and ZUEN refers to
his role as the "crescent moon". It has also been suggested that ZUEN
is the Akkadian equivalent of Sumerian NANNA; that is, they are two
different names for the same deity. However, there is no obvious
Semitic etymology for ZUEN.
The Akkadian equivalent of this DN is usually transcribed as either
"SIN" or "SUEN". The Sumerian word was also borrowed into Akkadian as a
common noun, appearing as SINU, SUENU, SINNU, and ShINNU. It is
glossed by the CAD as: "1) the moon 2) crescent shaped-shaped or
semi-circular object". [30]
These excerpts indicate that The Sumerian "ZU-EN" was related to the
Moon-Lord (Moon-God) also. This can only be when the Sumerian sign
which is read as "ZU" is also the Turkish word "UZ" which is another
Turkish name for "OGUZ" the Sky-God, "AGUZ" meaning "mouth", "UZ" (US)
meaning "wisdom", and "UZ (ÜZ, YÜZ) meaning "face". This is most
important to note. Thus by reading the Sumerian sign as ZU rather than
"UZ" in the Sumerian texts, they also eliminated the ancient Turanian
Sky-God's name "OGUZ" and the Turkish religious concepts associated
with this name.
As John L. Hayes writes: "The moon-god was also referred to as ZUEN."
[31]
This is only possible when the Sumerian signs which have been read as
"ZU-EN" (Turkish SU-HAN) are read as "UZ-EN" (Turkish UZ-HAN - i.e.,
OGUZ-HAN). Then, using Turkish, one can have a "moon" content
associated with the name ZUEN. In ancient writings, God's name was
generally hidden behind other names. For example, in ancient Masar
(Misir, "Egypt"), SOBEK was identified as the "crocodile-god". The
name SOBEK is another Turkish name like the Sumerian ZU-EN or EN-ZU.
SOBEK is defined as: "a crocodile-god, was worshipped in cities that
depended on water, such as the oasis city of CROKODILOPOLIS, where the
reptiles were kept in pools and adorned with jewels". [32]
The name SOBEK consists of "SO + BEK" which are Turkish "SU + BEK
(BEY)" meaning "Water-Lord". Thus Sumerian ZU, Masarian SO and Turkish
SU meaning "water" are all one and the same and are all Turkish. Now
metaphorically it can be said that the crocodile is the "lord" of the
water in a water-body such as the river Nile or in the rivers of
Amazon. Without question, the crocodile is the ruler of the water
where it lives.
Related to the name SOBEK is the Turkish name "OS-BEK" (USBEK, ÖZBEK,
UZBEK, OUZBEK, OGUZ-BEK, OGUZ-BEY) meaning "UZ-Lord, OGUZ-Lord" which
refers to the ancient Turanian Sky-God OGUZ. It must be noted that one
of the Central Asiatic Turkish states have the name "OZBEKISTAN", that
is, the country of OSBEK (ÖZBEK, UZBEK, USBEK, OSBEK) Turks.
Of course this identification makes Turkish as old as the ancient
Sumerians and Masarians.
Now returning back to the Sumerian name "dingir.ZUEN", it is clear that
this Sumerian name is another form of the Turkish name "Tengir SU-HAN".
However, hidden behind this name is the name US-HAN (UZ-HAN, OGUZ
HAN).
Furthermore, in order to understand and make the connection between
these God concepts, one should remember that in ancient Turanian
understanding, the Sun and Moon were regarded as the eyes of the
Sky-Father-God OGUZ or TUR. Hence Sun and Moon were one and the same
as the Sky-Father-God. Of course, the "eyes" are inseparable parts of
the ONE whole unity, that is, the universal Sky-God concept.
Additionally, it must be noted that the "Crescent Moon" in the sky
appears as a "smiling mouth" (Turkish AGUZ), while the waxing and
waning phases of the moon appear as an "eye" (Turkish GÖZ) and the
full moon appears as a "face" (Turkish "AG-UZ" (AK-YÜZ)) of a
"sky-moon-man". All of this is possible and occurs because of the
multiple identities that the Turkish name OGUZ represents. The Moon
was not the only "OGUZ" (O-GÖZ) in the sky. The Sun was also OGUZ
(O-GÖZ) in the sky in addition to the Sky-Father-God. Sumerologists,
by reading the Sumerian sign as ZU, rather than UZ, eliminated all of
these ancient Sumero-Turkish concepts.
The Sky-God OGUZ had six sons having the names of: GÜN-HAN (Sun-Lord),
AY-HAN (Moon-Lord), ILDUZ-HAN (Star-Lord), GÖK-HAN (Sky-Lord), DAG-HAN
(Mountain-Lord), and DENIZ-HAN (Sea-Lord, water-Lord). All of these
names are different appearing representations of ONE UNIVERSAL SKY-GOD
OGUZ under different names, such as Sumerian "ZUEN" (SU-HAN) which
hides the universal Sky-God's name "UZ-HAN" (OGUZ-HAN).
Now with this background knowledge, let us examine the Sumerian text
read as "dingir.AMAR-dingir.ZUEN" and translated as "AMAR-SIN" (see
attached Sumerian text). In the Sumerian word when we replace the name
"AMAR" with "TUR" we get the Sumerian expression
"dingir.TUR-dingir.ZU-EN" which becomes the same as the easily
recognizable Turkish expression "Tengir TUR-Tengir SU-HAN" meaning
"God-TUR God Lord-Water". In this context, again Sumerian and Turkish
are the same.
In the Sumerian text first line, if we read the second "dingir" sign as
"AN" meaning "sky", the text of the first line becomes "dingir.TUR-AN
ZU-EN" which is the Turkish expression "Tengir TUR-AN SU-HAN" meaning
"God TUR of Sky is God Water" or "Sky-God TUR is God-Water" which is a
correct concept because Sky-God (Gok Tanri) also delivers water (rain,
snow, ice) from the sky. This again makes the Sumerian and Turkish
expressions and concepts the same because Sumerian "TUR" is "AMAR",
"ZU" is "water" and "EN" is "lord". It should be noted that the
Sumerian text is written as "EN-ZU" but somehow it has been read as
"ZU-EN" which is in the same format that it appears in Turkish as
indicated above.
Now let us read the Sumerian sign that has been read "ZU" as "UZ", then
we get the following picture for the first line of Sumerian text:
"dingir.TUR-AN EN-UZ" which is the same as Turkish expression
"Tengir.TUR-AN HAN-UZ" (Tengir TUR AN HAN OGUZ) meaning "God TUR of Sky
is Lord Oguz". Thus the whole expression in both Sumerian and Turkish
is again Turanian and Turkish and describes the ancient Turanian
Sky-God as TUR and as OGUZ.
Additionally, when we read "TUR" and "AN" together, the Sumerian
expression becomes "dingir TURAN HAN-UZ" which is the Turkish
expression "TENGIR TURAN HAN-UZ" ("TANRI TURAN HAN-OGUZ" veya "TANRI
TURAN OGUZ-HAN") meaning "GOD of TURAN is LORD OGUZ". This again
clearly Identifies God UZ (OGUZ) with Turanian Oguz and TUR peoples.
It must be noted that the names TUR and TURAN are present in this
Sumerian text although they have been intentionally obliterated. All
of this obviously makes the Sumerians Tur/Turk people from Turan
(Central Asia).
The Semitic Akkadians and their followers tried to avoid reading these
Turkic names (i.e., TUR, TURAN, UZ, OGUZ) in the Sumerian texts and if
possible to bury them forever by changing the original Turkish
expression into "dingir.AMAR-dingir.ZUEN" AMAR-SIN. But the truth has
its own way of coming to the surface. It is clear that even changing
the place of a consonant, such as in the Turkish UZ becoming ZU (SU),
makes a mountain of a difference. The cabalist manipulator priests knew
this fact.
All of these also indicate that Turanian Tur/Turk peoples everywhere
had the concept of ONE UNIVERSAL SKY-GOD thousands of years before the
so-called "Monotheistic God" religions were initiated by the so-called
"Semites". Evidently, this Turanian concept was also
borrowed-without-permission.
***
The name SIN is defined as: "an early god of the moon, son of ENLIL and
husband of NINGAL. Sin's bright light kept watch against evil forces
in the night. When UTUKKU succeeded in extinguishing his brilliance
with the help of ISHTAR and SHAMASH, MARDUK fought off the attackers
and brought back the eclipsed light of SIN". [33]
If the SIN is Semitic for "moon" as we are told, and since "AMAR" (in
one meaning, Turkish "EMER") means "young", then AMAR.SIN would mean
"Young Moon" referring to the "crescent moon" which embellishes the
flags of Turkish peoples to this day. In this metaphorical context, the
"crescent moon" represents the horns of a "young black bull" whose body
is not visible. AMAR-SIN is described as "young bull".
Yet, in spite of this, identifying SIN as "a god of moon" is
intentional disinformation. This identification is not telling the
truth about its original meaning and its Turkish source. The
explanation we are being given does not tell the whole story. It only
tells the altered "Akkadian" version.
Let us examine the term dingir AMAR.SIN. The origin of AMAR-SIN is in
the Turkish expression "MA-ARSIN" (Ma Ersin, Ma Er Sen) meaning:
a) "Moon Man you are" ("you are Moon Man"). Therefore, the "moon"
aspect of "AMAR-SIN" is coming from Turkish "MA", not from "SIN" as
portrayed. Thus AMAR-SIN is a word that has its origin in Turkish
rather than Semitic which did not even exist before they started to
manufacture Akkadian from Sumero-Turkish.
The word "MA" corresponding to the Turkish name "AY" meaning "Moon" is
also indicated in Turkish OGUZ-KAGAN epic [34]. But Turkish expression
MA-Tengri" not only means "Moon-God" but also refers to the Magnificent
Sky-Father-God and the Magnificent Sun-God all of which are represented
by the name TUR.
b) "You are Magnificent Man" referring to the ancient Turanian
Sky-Father-God, where "MA" means "magnificent", AR/ER means "man", and
SIN (SEN) means "you" or "you are". In this context, when the Sumerian
text is read as "dingir.MA-ER-dingir ZU-EN", it is the same
as the Turkish expression "tengir.MA ER tengir.SU HAN" (Deniz Han)
literally meaning "God Magnificent Man is God Water Lord". Water is an
essential element of nature, just like air ("hava" in Turkish), without
which there would be no life as we know of.
However, if the Sumerian text is read as "dingir.MA-ER-dingir.EN-UZ"
then it becomes the Turkish expression "Tengir MA ER Tengir HAN-UZ
(OGUZ)" meaning "God Magnificent Man God Lord OGUZ" which defines the
ancient Turanian supreme creator Sky-God Han-Oguz (or Oguz-Han) which
includes not only the Sun-God and Moon-God but is regarded as the
omnipotent universal Sky-Father-God.
Evidently, this similarity between the Turkic words "ZU" and "UZ" has
been subject to deliberate confusion. Of course, when the UZ aspect of
the Sumerian text is not brought to the surface, then its Turkish
religious content is obliterated altogether. When Turkish "MA-AR" (MA
ER) is read as "AMAR", and "UZ" is read as "ZU", this amounts to
intentional misreading and misnaming.
It is important to bring to the attention of the reader the Sumerian
word "ZU" which has the meaning of "to know" or "wisdom" [35] It is
interesting to note that Turkish "US" (UZ) also means "wisdom,
knowledge". This is not due to coincidence. The peculiar thing is that
these words (ZU and UZ) are opposites of each other in format, yet they
have similar religious meanings. The implication of this is that those
who read and translated the Sumerian signs somehow changed the meanings
and/or formats around so that many of the original Sumero-Turkish words
could not be identified with the Turkish language. The important
question here is, how did the Sumerologists determine that the Sumerian
sign was vocalized as ZU - rather than UZ? Could it be that they used
the Turkish language as a reference to decode and understand the
Sumerian sign but then transcribed the sign as ZU instead of UZ?
***
Returning once more to Sumerian Texts 13a and/or 13b of John L. Hayes'
book, for example, the first three lines in each case are extremely
important. John L. Hayes reports about the readings of Lines 1-3 as
follows:
Line 1: Transliterated as "dingir.AMAR-dingir.ZUEN", transcribed as
"AMARZUEN", and translated as "AMAR-SIN".
Line 2: Transliterated as NIBRU.(ki).A, transcribed as "NIBRU.A", and
translated as "PROPOSED BY ENLIL IN NIPPUR".
John L. Hayes also writes: [36] "The Sumerian pronounciation of the
name of the city of Nippur is known from lexical lists, where
EN-LIL(ki) is spelled out as NI-IB-RU. Similarly, the Akkadian
pronounciation of the city is also known from lexical lists, where it
is spelled out as NI-IP-PU-RU."
My note: the Sumerian signs of this line reads "EN-IL-KI-A". To get
the name NIPPUR from it requires a lot of imagination unless they
substituted a replacement that had similar meaning. In other words,
they are not reporting or telling us what is actually present in the
Sumerian line but rather the NIPPUR replacement.
Sumerian "EN-IL-KI-A" is Turkic "HAN-IL KÖY'E" or "HAN-IL GÖYE"
(IL-HAN KÖYE/GÖYE) meaning "King to village" or "King to sky"
respectively. Since the first line talks about the Sky-God TUR and UZ
(OGUZ), it follows that this line refers to "King to Sky" (Lord to
Sky). "Lord to Sky" referring to Sky-God has another description in
Turkish, that ia, "HAN BIR O" meaning "Only Him is Lord". This would
properly translate into Sumerian writing as "EN-BI-RU". But this is
very much the same as the given Sumerian name "NI-IB-RU" which seems to
have some intentional alterations done to it. Both the Sumerian
"NI-IB-RU" and Akkadian "NI-IP-PU-RU" sound very much like the name "AN
HEBREW" (Sky Lord BIR-O) which the Jews have falsely claimed as a name
for themselves. In other words, the Tur/Turk Sumerian text has been
anagrammatized, Semitized and usurped.
The Turkish expression "HAN BIR O" (AN BIR-O) has two meanings: 1)
"Only Him is Lord" referring to the Sky-God which I indicated above; 2)
"Palace of the Lord" where Turkish "HAN" also means "complex of a large
building" which a Lord's palace is. Similarly, Turkish "HAN" (AN) also
refers to "sky" where the Sky-God resides. After all, the Sky is a
|City" or "Palace" to the Sky God. Either the scholars do not know this
Turkic concept, which is likely, or they know but do not wish to dwell
on it.
There is another case similar to the misreading of "NI-IB-RU" (Tr.
"EN-BIR-U") and that is the reading of the name "PER-U" (BIR-O) of
ancient Masarian (falsely called "Egyptian") kings. This Masarian
(Misir) word read as "PER-U" is the Turkish expression "BIR-O"
referring to the ancient Turanian "One Sky-God". The Tur/Turk Masarian
Pharoahs, by calling themselves PERU (BIRO), were deifying themselves
as God on earth. Additionally, PER-O refers to their palaces as Great
House (BIR-ÖY, ESSIZ-ÖY). PERU also refers to the "sky" which is
also "BIR ÖY" meaning "one-house".
The title Pharaoh is defined as: [Late Latin "Pharao", from Greek
"Pharao", from Hebrew "Par'oh", from Egypt "PR-'O" meaning "great
house".] A title of the sovereigns of ancient Egypt; Pharaoh used in
the Bible as proper name. [37]
Evidently scholars have not been totally truthful in reading this
Masarian text either, because it was the Turkish expression "BIR-O"
describing the Sky-God (Gök-Tanri), and "BIR-OY" (bir öy) meaning
"one house" or "great house" referring to both the Sky" and the
"palace" of the Pharaoh. Clearly the ancient Indo-Europeans and Semites
anagrammatized, restructured and disguised this ancient Tur/Tur
Masarian name in order to distance it from Turks and Turkish.
So the Sumerian "NI-IB-RU", Masarian "PER-O" and Turkish "BIR-O" and
"HAN BIR-O" are one and the same and they are all Turkish in origin
contrary to all kinds of distortion attached to them. With this
explanation, it is doubtfull that the meaning of NIPPUR has been
explained truthfully by the Sumerologists.
Line 3: Transliterated as "dingir.EN-LIL-LE", transcribed as "ENLIL.E".
Yet the signs in Line 3 read as "dingir.EN-IL-LE". The Sumerian
"EN-IL" and Turkish "HAN-IL" are one and the same and mean the "Lord of
the Country", that is, the "king". On the other hand, in order to be
able to get the "wind" concept into this Sumerian/Turkish expression,
one has to read the Sumerian writing "dingir.EN IL-LE" as Turkish
"dingir HEN ILLI" (HAN YELLI) meaning "God Lord windy". Only then could
the Sumerologist attach the "wind" concept to this
Sumero-Turkish expression.
This indicates that the so-called Akkadian "ENLIL" is nothing but a
misread Turkish expression. However this Turkish etymology has never
been mentioned until now as I reveal it to the readers.
Of course it is said that the Sumerian word "LIL" means "wind" [38] It
is curious that the Turkish word "YIL" (YEL) also means "wind". Now,
what reader would stop to ask, how did the Sumerologist determine that
this Sumerian sign was vocalized as LIL rather than YEL as in Turkish?
Would readers even suspect that intentional misreading was being done?
Of course not We have another similar case where we are told that
Sumerian "LAL" [39] means "honey". But Turkish "BAL" also means
"honey". How do we know that the original Sumerian word was not BAL
but rather LAL - as it is presented?
In regards to these three lines of Sumerian text, it seems that line 2
and Line 3 have been combined to give a manufactured meaning of:
"PROPOSED BY ENLIL IN NIPPUR". The implication of the presentation of
these three lines together with Line 4, is that most likely, some
Babylonian cabalist priests gathered in a place, possibly they called
"Nippur", where they proposed and decided among themselves, quite
self-servingly, that they would transcribe and call the Sumerian name
written in Line-1 as "AMARZUEN" and translate it as "AMAR-SIN". and
then portray this changeover in such a way that as if the Wind-God
Enlil himself ordered or proposed it. There seems to be a use of
sophistry and mythological fabrication here.
***
John L. Hayes writes the following regarding "ZUEN", "SIN" and "AMAR"
relations: [40]
"The Akkadian equivalent of this DN is usually transcribed as either
"SIN" or "SUEN". The Sumerian word was also borrowed into Akkadian as a
common noun, appearing as SINU, SUENU, SINNU, and ShINNU. It is
glossed by the CAD as: "1) the moon 2) crescent shaped-shaped or
semi-circular object.
AMAR-(d)ZUEN Etymologically, "young bull of Zuen", amar.Zuen.(ak). The
name of this ruler is often transcribed "Amar-Sin" or "Amar-Zuen",
which are really Akkadianized transcriptions."
Sumerian or Akkadian common nouns, appearing as SINU, SUENU, SINNU, and
ShINNU may be matched with Turkish words and/or expressions as follows:
SINU (< "SIN-U"): Turkish "SEN O" meaning "You are Him/Her/It" which is
a reference to the ancient Turanian trinity Sky-God Oguz concept.
SUENU (< "SU-EN-U"): Turkish "SU HANU" meaning "Water Lord" which is
the same as Sumerian "ZU-EN" but does not refer to the moon.
SINNU (< "SIN-NU"): Turkish "SIN ANU" (SEN HAN O) meaning "You are
that Lord" which again refers to the Sky-God Oguz-Tur concept, and
ShINNU (< "SH-IN-NU"): Turkish "ISI-HAN ANU' meaning "Lord Light / Lord
Warmth is ANU" where reference is made to Sun and Moon and the creator
Sky-God ANU.
It is clear that there is much more than the "moon" concept in these
expressions. By bringing forward only: 1) the moon, 2) crescent shaped
or semi-circular object" aspect of them obliterates all the others and
keeps only the Moon related ones. As John L. Hayes also says, these
are really Akkadianized transcriptions, more correctly, they are
"anagrammatized" Turkic expressions without reference to Tur, Turan or
Turkish.
John L. Hays also gives us the following: [41]
"Early scholars believed that this PN was Akkadian. The Akkadian
equivalent of AMAR is BURU. Therefore, the name appears in some older
secondary literature as "BUR-SIN", or something similar. Almost all
modern scholars believe that the name is Sumerian, although there is
really not much evidence to prove this."
Again the names AMAR, BURU and BUR-SIN look suspiciously Turkish.
AMAR (< "AM-AR"): Turkish "MA ER" meaning "Magnificent MAN" and/or
"Moon Man".
BURU (< "BUR-U"): Turkish "BIR O" the name of the ancient Turanian
trinity Sky-Father-God , Sun-God and Moon-God.
BUR-SIN: Turkish "BIRSIN" meaning "You are One" again referring to the
ancient Turanian trinity Sky-Father-God, Sun-God and Moon-God (not just
the Moon-God).
Thus again we see that there has been a fraudulent game perpetrated in
order to wipe away the Turkish content, that is, the one language that
the world spoke at that time.
Evidently, the supposedly Semitic word "SIN" meaning "moon or moon-god"
could not readily be derived from "dingir.TUR-AN-ZUEN" unless some
intentional manipulation took place.
There is another possible source for connecting "SIN" to "TUR and hence
to "Moon". It is in the "Semitic" name "Mount SINAI" which is known in
Turkish as "TUR Dagi" meaning "Mount TUR". The name "SINAI" is made up
with two Turkish words, that is, "SIN" (SEN) meaning "you" or "you
are", and "AI" (AY) meaning "moon". Thus the word "SINAI", analyzed in
Turkish, means "You are Moon" indicating that this mountain has been
named after the Turkish name for "Moon". It seems that this mountain
name and the name of "SINAI" peninsula must have been "TUR mountain"
and "TUR peninsula" in very ancient times before the name was changed
to SINAI. This was so because before "Semites" ever had power to
control any area, the whole so-called Middle East was in use by the
ancient Turanian peoples. It is no wonder that in ancient times the
Arabian peninsula was called "TURIYE" or "TUR ÖY" meaning "home of
TURs". [42]
In manufacturing the name SINAI, the SIN (SEN) component has been
labelled as "moon" instead of the "AI" (AY) component. Thus the "moon"
concept has been wrongly or intentionally given to the element of "SIN"
rather than the "AY". Thus wrongfully, SIN has been allocated the
meaning "moon" or "moon-god" in Akkadian and other Semitic languages.
Again we see here that there has been an abduction of Turanian
civilization by way of anagrammatizing, that is switching or shuffling
words, word components and their meanings.
In ancient Turanian world, "Moon" was regarded as the "left blind eye"
of the Sky-God TUR. However the "full moon" was quite a showy "eye" of
TUR as the sun's rays were reflected from its face onto Earth. Hence
the Moon-God was also TUR, that is, the Sky-God.
The ancient Semites choosing the name of "Mount SINAI", Arabic "Jebel
MUSA" and Turkish "TUR Dagi" for this mountain is meaningful. It
indicates that the original name of this mountain was Turkic "TUR" and
"TUR" meant "Moon", and Semitic names were derived from the original
Turkic name. The name MOSES (MUSA) is supposed to have had his talk
with God at the top of this mountain. At the top of a mountain one can
talk either to himself or to the sound of the wind. The ancient Semites
believed and worshipped not only the Wind-God ENLIL (Turkish "HAN-YIL"
or "HAN-YILLI"), they also believed in the "moon", particularly the
"dark moon" as a supreme deity.
CONCLUSIONS:
We have shown that the Sumerian "Dingir. AMAR-Dingir ZUEN" translated
as AMAR-SIN has its origin in Turkish. We also showed that Sumerian and
Turkish were not only related to each other, but that most likely
Turkish was an earlier language.
After the Semitic Akkadians invaded Sumer, the Sumerian language,
pantheon and mythology went through endless deliberate alterations and
usurpations. The artificial "Akkadian" language was manufactured using
Sumero-Turkish words and phrases as source material for coming up with
words for a language that they called "Akkadian" which served as a
model for other "Semitic" languages.
It is fair to say that a misrepresentation of the original
Turkish-Sumerian language has been perpetrated since ancient times by
obliterating Turkish names like TUR, TURAN, UZ (OGUZ), US, ZU (SU), HAN
and many others, and reading the Sumero-Turkish texts and/or Turkish
words/phrases and attributing them to Semitic Akkadian or
Assyro-Babylonian while ignoring their real Turanian Turkic origin.
This kind of misrepresentation wiped away the most ancient Turan
civilization, and replaced it falsely with a Semitic and Indo-European
one. Thus we are all conned and misled.
It is clear that the readings of ancient Sumerian texts have been
distorted, particularly with respect to the ancient Turanian Tur/Turk
civilization. Sumerian is not a dead language as we are told. Sumerian
is still alive in Turkish. The starting point for Sumerology, that is,
the study of Sumerian language and Sumerian civilization, has to be
viewed together with Turkish language and Turanian civilization. This
cannot be avoided anymore.
REFERENCES:
[20] C. J. GADD, "A Sumerian Reading-Book", an Assistant in the
Department of Egyptian and Assyrian Antquities, the British Museum,
Oxford at Clarendon Press, 1924, p. 183.
[21] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", Undena
Publications, Malibu, 1990, p. 147.
[22] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 147.
[23] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 151
with reference to Text 13b.
[24] Edgar H. Sturtevant, "A Hittite Glossary", Yale University, The
Linguistic Society of America, 1936, p. 35.
[25] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 117.
[26] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 157.
[27] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 157.
[28] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 157.
[29] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 147.
[30] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 147.
[31] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 26.
[32] Lionel Casson and The TIME-LIFE Books, Ancient Egypt", Time
Incorporated, New York, 1965, p. 185.
[33] Rhoda A. Hendricks, "Mythologies of the World A Concise
Encyclopedia", McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1973, p. 178.
[34] Huseyin Namik ORKON, "Eski Türk Yazitlari", Türk Dil Kurumu
Yayinlari: 529, Ankara, 1987, p. 877.
[35] C. J. GADD, "A Sumerian Reading-Book", Oxford at Clarendon Press,
1924, p. 194.
[36] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 153.
[37] Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Fifth Edition, 1947, p. 744.
[38] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 286.
[39] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 286.
[40] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 147.
[41] John L. Hayes, "A Manual Of Sumerian Grammar and Texts", p. 147.
[42] "Türk Dünyasi El Kitabi, Cilt I", Türk Kültürünü Arastirma
Enstitüsü Yayinlari No. 121, 1992, p. 107.
Best wishes to all,
Polat Kaya
22/01/2005
(Copyright © 2005 Polat Kaya)
============= End of Part-2; to be continued in Part-3 ============
The reader is cordially invited to visit Polat Kaya Library for other
writings at URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Polat_Kaya/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Polat_Kaya/join
---------------------------------------------------------------------
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------------------------------------------------------------
----- "Biz Çevirmenlere N'oluyor!" bilgi topluluklari, ------------
----- allingus'un kültür hizmetlerinden biridir. Mayis 2001 ------
----- ***@yahoo.com; ***@gmail.com --------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-- allingus Çeviri Hizmetleri \ / allingus Translation Services --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bcn_2004/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
bcn_2004-***@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
---------------------------------------------------------------------